Youth’s Mesopolitical Agency: A Valuable Lens for Peace Research and Praxis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65826/IJPCR.1.1.2026.4Keywords:
Intercommunal Conflict; Mesopolitical Agency; Peace Praxis; Project Interventions; YouthAbstract
This brief article introduces a new empirical assessment of the concept of mesopolitical agency to examine youth engagement in peace and conflict in South Sudan. Mesopolitical agency refers to an active role of managing power across multiple spheres of life. Drawing on data from a people-to-people peacebuilding project, the assessment focuses on the analytic power of mesopolitical agency to (i) explore youth engagement in peace and conflict in the Unity State and, in so doing, to (ii) contribute to advancing peace research and praxis. The assessment was conducted using governance diaries, interviews, focus groups, and documentary data from multiple stakeholders. The findings demonstrate, inter alia, that youth actively engage with local systems of power through conflict and emerging roles in modest peace initiatives. The findings illustrate youth’s exercise of mesopolitical agency, where the substance and extent of their participation or disaffection can significantly shape and be shaped by the dynamics of peace and conflict. Overall, this article notes challenges to essentialist perspectives on youth as subjects of inherent, static, or unidimensional determinable positionalities vis-à-vis peace and conflict. Finally, there are concrete implications for research and practice that may achieve a stronger understanding and optimization of youth’s potential role in peace.
References
African Union. (2009). African Youth Charter. https://au.int/sites/default/files/treaties/7789-treaty-0033_-_african_youth_charter_e.pdf
Amarasuriya, H., Gündüz, C., & Mayer, M. (2009). Rethinking the nexus between youth, unemployment and conflict–Perspectives from Sri Lanka. Strengthening the Economic Dimensions of Peacebuilding Case Study Series, International Alert. https://www.international-alert.org/app/uploads/2021/09/Economy-Youth-Unemployment-Conflict-Sri-Lanka-EN-2009.pdf
Bangura, I. (2023). When peace means nothing: Reflections on youth marginality and agency in Postwar Sierra Leone. African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review, 13(1), 106-128. https://doi.org/10.2979/acp.2023.a900892
Barnett, J. (2008). Peace and Development: Towards a New Synthesis. Journal of Peace Research, 45(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343307084924
Bergen. N., & Labonté, R. (2019). “Everything Is Perfect, and We Have No Problems”: Detecting and Limiting Social Desirability Bias in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research. 30(5):783-792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319889354
Choo, L. W. (2020). Youth citizenship and democracy in conflict-affected, postcolonial states: Relating the social and the political in Myanmar. [PhD Thesis, University of Auckland].
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2016). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), pp. 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Danish Refugee Council. (2017). Dynamics of Youth and Violence: Findings from Rubkona County, Unit State. www.stgpeaceau.org/user/themes/stg/documents/72/En_ddg_2017-dynamics-of-youth-and-violence-rubkona_for-release.pdf
Daoust, G. (2018). Education and the critique of liberal peacebuilding: the case of South Sudan. [PhD Thesis, University of Sussex]. https://hdl.handle.net/10779/uos.23458907.v1
Duku SFC. (2022, April 27) South Sudan peace committees campaign for peace and hunger-free communities: “Mothers are tired of burying their own children”. World Vision. https://www.wvi.org/stories/south-sudan/south-sudan-peace-committees-campaign-peace-and-hunger-free-communities-mothers
Ensor, M. O. (2021). Climate change, environmental action, and the youth, peace, and security agenda: Global policies, local efforts. In M. O. Ensor (Ed.), securitizing youth young people’s roles in the global peace and security agenda (ch. 7). Rutgers University Press. https://doi.org/10.36019/9781978822412-008
Felix da Costa, D. (2023). Youth gangs and overcoming waithood in a United Nations protection of civilians site in South Sudan. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 18(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2023.2212993
Fleetwood, S. (2016). The critical realist conception of open and closed systems. Journal of Economic Methodology, 24(1), 41–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2016.1218532
Galtung, J. (2009). Theories of Conflict: Definitions, dimensions, negations, formations. University of Oslo. https://www.transcend.org/files/Galtung_Book_Theories_Of_Conflict_single.pdf
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301
Gibb, M., Bubna. M., Gallegos, I., Ramoeletsi, T., & Wayne, Y. (2022, April 28). Letter dated 28 April 2022 from the Panel of Experts on South Sudan addressed to the President of the Security Council. UN Security Council S/2022/359. https://www.un.org/sexualviolenceinconflict/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/report/letter-dated-28-april-from-the-panel-of-experts-on-south-sudan-addressed-to-the-president-of-the-security-council/Letter-from-South-Sudan-Panel-of-Experts-to-President-of-SC.pdf
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Homonchuk, O., Dessie, E., Banks, N., ..., & Gebremariam, E.B. (2024, July). Youth and capability development: Domain report. African Cities Research Consortium, Working Paper 17. https://www.african-cities.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/ACRC_Working-Paper-17_July-2024.pdf
Idris, I. (2018). Livestock and conflict in South Sudan. K4D Helpdesk Report 484. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12413/14316
Loureiro, M., Joshi, A., Barnes, K., & Chaimite, E. (2023). Governance Diaries: An Approach to Researching Marginalized People’s Lived Experiences in Difficult Settings. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221150106
Mac Ginty, R. (2014). Everyday peace: Bottom-up and local agency in conflict-affected societies. Security Dialogue, 45(6), 548-564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614550899
Mac Ginty, R. (2021). Conflict disruption: Reassessing the peaceandconflict system. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 16(1), pp. 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2021.1889167
McEvoy-Levy, S. (2024). Youth and Peacebuilding. In R. Mac Ginty (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Peacebuilding (2nd ed., ch. 18). Routledge.
Omale, D. J. O. (2013). Terrorism and counter terrorism in Nigeria: Theoretical paradigms and lessons for public policy. Canadian Social Science, 9(3), 96. http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720130903.2916
Oosterling, H. (2014). Mesopolitical interests: Rotterdam Skillcity as rhizomatic, ecosophical, reflactive event. In R. Braidotti & R. Dolphijn (Eds.), This Deleuzian Century (vol. 400 pp. 269-298). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211987_012
Oosterom, M., Kache, C., Mususa, D., & Pswarayi, L. (2016). The Violent Politics of Informal Work, and How Young People Navigate Them: A Conceptual Framework, IDS Evidence Report 198, IDS. http://www.ids.ac.uk/publication/the-violent-politics-of-informal-work-and-howyoung-people-navigate-them-a-conceptual-framework
Oosterom, M. (2017). Gendered (in)security in South Sudan: masculinities and hybrid governance in Imatong state. Peacebuilding, 5(2), 186-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2016.1277015
Ozcelik, A., & Shaw, D. O. (2023). References to youth in peace agreements, 1990-2022: Introducing a new dataset. Project Report. University of Glasgow. http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TZZOEX
Price, R.A., & A. Orrnert (2017). Youth in South Sudan: livelihoods and conflict. K4D Helpdesk Report. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12413/14236
Ray, S. (2016). Sooner or later: The timing of ethnic conflict onsets after independence. Journal of Peace Research, 53(6), 800-814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316663814
Seal, M. (2016). Critical Realism’s Potential Contribution to Critical Pedagogy and Youth and Community Work: Human Nature, Agency and Praxis Revisited. Journal of Critical Realism, 15(3), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2016.1169721
Search for Common Ground. (September 2018). Women and the future of South Sudan: Local insights on building inclusive constituencies for peace. https://reliefweb.int/report/south-sudan/women-and-future-south-sudan-local-insights-building-inclusive-constituencies
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor
Smith, M. L., & Seward, C. (2009). The relational ontology of Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Incorporating social and individual causes. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(2), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452820902940927
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anas N. Almassri, Marissa Bell, Edmore Mahlupeka, Katja Starc Card, Camilla Bober

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






